ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the role of nosocomial infection informatics surveillance system in the prevention and control of multidrug-resistant organisms(MDROs) infections. METHODS: The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University was selected as the study subjects, which had adopted the nosocomial infection informatics surveillance system since Jan.2020. The period of Jan.to Dec.2020 were regarded as the study period, and Jan.to Dec.2019 were regarded as the control period. The situation of nosocomial infection and MDROs infections in the two periods were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of nosocomial infections and underreporting of nosocomial infection cases in this hospital during the study period were 2.52%(1 325/52 624) and 1.74%(23/1 325), respectively, and the incidences of ventilator associated pneumonia(VAP), catheter related bloodstream infection(CRBSI), catheter related urinary tract infection(CAUTI)were 4.10(31/7 568), 2.11(14/6 634), and 2.50(25/9 993) respectively, which were lower than those during the control period(P< 0.05). The positive rate of pathogenic examination in the hospital during the study period was 77.95%(1 269/1 628), which was higher than that during the control period(P<0.05), the overall detection rate of MDROs was 15.77%(206/1 306), the detection rates of MDROs in Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus were lower than those during the control period(P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The development and application of the informatics technology-based surveillance system of nosocomial infection could effectively reduce the incidence of nosocomial infections and device related infections, decrease the under-reporting of infection cases, and also reduce the detection rate of MDROs as well as the proportion of MDROs detected in common pathogenic species.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has required clinical teams to function with an unprecedented amount of uncertainty, balancing complex risks and benefits in a highly fluid environment. This is especially the case when considering the delivery of a pregnant woman critically unwell with COVID-19. This is one maternal critical care team's reflections on establishing best practice and a shared mental model when undertaking a Caesarean section in critically unwell patients with COVID-19. Objective(s): We describe our experience of balancing the risks and streamlining the process of this high-risk intervention. Method(s): We used our standard clinical governance forums across four specialties (Obstetrics, Intensive care, Anaesthetics and Neonatology) to identify key challenges and learning points. We developed a working group to combine our learning and develop a shared mental model across the involved teams. Result(s): 1. The decision to deliver must be multidisciplinary involving Obstetrics, Intensive care, Anaesthetics, Neonatology and the patient according to their capacity to participate. The existing structure of twice daily ITU ward rounds could be leveraged as a 'pause' moment to consider the need for imminent delivery and review the risk-benefit balance of continued enhanced pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. 2. We identified a range of scenarios that our teams might be exposed to: 3. Perimortem Caesarean section 4. Critically unwell - unsafe to move to theatre 5. Critically unwell - safe to move to theatre 6. Recreating an obstetric theatre in the ICU Advantages Avoids moving a critically unstable patient, although our experience is increasing moving patients for ECMO. Some forms of maximal non-invasive therapy such as High Flow Nasal Oxygen may require interruption to move to theatre with resultant risk of harm or be difficult to continue in transport mode through a bulky ICU ventilator e.g. CPAP Disadvantages Significant logistics and coordination burden: multiple items of specialist equipment needing to be brought to the ICU. Human factors burden: performing a caesarean section in an unfamiliar environment is a significant increase in cognitive load for participating teams. Environmental factors: ICU side rooms may offer limited space vs the need to control the space if performed on an open unit. Delivering a Neonate into a COVID bubble. Conclusion(s): Developing a shared mental model across the key teams involved in delivering an emergency caesarean section in this cohort of critically unwell patients has enabled our group to own a common understanding of the key decisions and risks involved. We recommend a patient centred MDT decision making model, with a structure for regular reassessment by senior members of the teams involved. In most circumstances the human factors and logistical burden of recreating an operating theatre in the ICU outweighs the risk of transport to theatre. Pre-defined checklists and action cards mitigate the cognitive and logistical burden when multiple teams do perform an operative delivery in ICU. Action cards highlight key aspects of routine obstetric care to be replicated in the ICU environment.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: In common with many aspects of critical illness recovery, there is no universally accepted formula for "weaning," the term used to describe the process of liberating patients from mechanical ventilation.1-3 Understanding a patient's progress during a prolonged wean can be difficult and requires integration of various datasets. Therefore, it is good practice to ensure that weaning prescriptions are clear, easy to follow and adhered to and that weaning-associated data and meta data are recorded accurately and are easy to interpret. The prototype Digitally Enhanced Liberation from VEntilation (DELVE) system has been designed to be used in combination with the Puritan Bennett(TM) 980 (PB980) ventilator (Covidien, USA). DELVE is an open-loop system which provides an interactive weaning chart, combining the weaning prescription entered by the clinical staff, with actual settings recorded from the ventilator in order to display compliance with the prescription (Figure 1). DELVE also collects measured data from the ventilator which could be used to display respiratory performance, both real-time and historical. Figure 1. DELVE set up with the PB980 ventilator (in the simulation suite). Objective(s): This feasibility study was designed to inform development of the first DELVE prototype and a future clinical trial to determine clinical effectiveness and usefulness. The study objectives were to determine whether DELVE could: 1. Present a digital weaning chart that staff could use effectively and would be superior to the current paper version. 2. Record and display the patients' ventilatory performance, both real time and historical, during liberation from mechanical ventilation. Method(s): This was a mixed-methods, prospective feasibility study of a complex intervention.4 Ventilated patients with a tracheostomy, commencing the weaning process, were recruited from an adult intensive care unit. DELVE was used alongside the current paper-based system for weaning planning and data collection. Patients remained in the study until they no longer required the support of the PB980 ventilator. Result(s): Twenty patients were enrolled for between 25 and 270 hours each. There were no safety incidents or data breaches. DELVE was successfully operated by staff, who were able to connect DELVE to the ventilator, prescribe weaning plans and analyse adherence. The digital weaning chart user interface was intuitive and easy to navigate. It was clearer, more complete and easier to interpret when compared to the paper weaning charts (Figure 2). DELVE reliably collected data every ten seconds and safely stored over six million items of measured data and 25000 events, such as alarm triggers and setting changes, in a form that could allow analysis and pictorial or graphical presentation. Conclusion(s): This study supported the feasibility of this and future versions of DELVE to present both a digital weaning chart and to facilitate visual and numerical data presentation. Future iterations of the system could include a user-friendly dashboard representing patient progress during the weaning process. Assimilation of large volumes of data could be used to enhance understanding and inform decision making around the prolonged wean.
ABSTRACT
Background: Managing patients with cancer during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been challenging. Disruptions in cancer management have been observed due to cancellation of treatment, issues related to commuting, and dearth of health-care workers. Objective(s): This study was conducted during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and was aimed at evaluating the 30-day all-cause mortality among patients with cancer and COVID-19 infection and the factors affecting it. Material(s) and Method(s): In this retrospective study, we collected secondary data from nine tertiary care centers in South India over a period of 10 months from March to Dec 2020. Patients across all age groups with histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of cancer who were affected by COVID-19 during their evaluation or treatment were included in the study. The primary outcome variables of the present study were 30-day all-cause mortality, cancer outcomes, and COVID-19 outcomes. Result(s): A total of 206 patients were included. Median age of the cohort was 55.5 years, and the male-To-female ratio was 1:1.03. The 30-day mortality rate was 12.6%. Twenty-Two patients (10.7%) had severe COVID-19 infection at the initial presentation. Predictors for severe pneumonia at the initial presentation were incomplete remission at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis and palliative intent of treatment. Severe pneumonia at the initial presentation, diagnosis of COVID-19 on or before August 2020, and need for ventilator support were associated with increased mortality. Conclusion(s): Severity of infection at the initial presentation, cancer status, and the intent of cancer treatment impact COVID-19 outcomes in patients with cancer.Copyright © 2022 Iranian Society of Ophthalmology. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: We aimed to report long-term brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in survivors of ICU-treated COVID-19 compared to other groups. Material(s) and Method(s): In this prospective cohort study 70 ICU-treated, 46 ward-treated and 46 home-isolated patients, diagnosed with COVID-19 in 2020, underwent brain MRI 6 months after the acute phase to determine the presence of cerebral microbleeds (CMB) and Fazekas scale. Result(s): CMBs existed in 27 (38.6%) ICU-treated, 13 (28.3%) ward-treated, 8 (17.4%) home-isolated COVID-19 patients, and in 12 (22.6%) non-COVID controls (Figure 1). The number of CMBs in COVID-19 patients and controls was median 2 (IQR 1-4) and 1 (IQR 1-2), respectively. Patients with CMBs differed from those without, regarding age (median 62 vs. 52 years, p < 0.001), history of arterial hypertension (50% vs. 31%, p = 0.03), need of ICU (56% vs. 38%, p = 0.03) and ventilator treatment (42% vs. 22%, p = 0.01), length of hospital stay (median 21 vs. 12 days, p < 0.001), and supplementary oxygen therapy (median 18 vs. 10 days, p = 0.008), respectively. Within the ICU group, patients with and without CMBs differed regarding the duration of ICU stay (median 17 vs. 9 days, p = 0.006), and mechanical ventilation (median 14 vs. 6 days, p = 0.002). In multivariable analysis, only age was associated with CMBs (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.09). The majority of subjects in all groups had Fazekas scale one for white matter hyperintensities (Figure 1). Conclusion(s): Although the severity of respiratory failure and history of arterial hypertension were associated with the presence of CMBs, only age was an independent predictor of CMBs.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Assessment of the literature on the ProtekDuo cannula when used as venopulmonary (V-P) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in ARDS secondary to COVID-19. Method(s): Systematic literature search in EMBASE, Medline (Pubmed) and NHS library using appropriate keywords as well as PICOS and PRISMA approach. Result(s): We found 285 publications, of which 5 publications met the search criteria and were included in this review. A total of 194 patients with COVID-19 related ARDS had a ProtekDuo placed to establish venovenous (V-V) ECMO and right ventricular (RV) support. Patients treated with the ProtekDuo cannula had survival rates between between the studies of 59 and 89%, with a significant survival compared to an invasive ventilation group or when compared to dual site V-V ECMO or other double lumen ECMO cannulas. One of the studies focused on extubation and early discontinuation of ventilator support, which the authors achieved in 100% of ProtekDuo patients. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was significantly reduced in the ProtekDuo versus other groups. Conclusion(s): The ProtekDuo displayed lower mortality rates, AKI occurrence and CRRT need as compared to other respiratory support modalities and has shown to be a game changer for ECMO support in patients suffering from COVID-19 ARDS. Many authors suggested the ProtekDuo for first line use in these patients.
ABSTRACT
Submission content Introduction: This is a story about the day I wheeled a patient outside. I know, it sounds somewhat underwhelming. But little did I know that this short trip down a hospital corridor and beyond the entrance foyer would mark a profound shift in perspective both for me and my patient, which I hope will influence me for the rest of my career. Main Body: "Paul" was in his 50s and severely afflicted by COVID-19, resulting in a protracted ICU admission with a slow and arduous ventilator wean. Throughout his time on the unit, Paul had seen no daylight;no view of the outside world. He was struggling to make progress and was becoming exasperated. His deteriorating mood in turn affected his sleep, which further undermined his progress. Due to COVID-19, visiting was not permitted and Paul's cuffed tracheostomy meant that he couldn't speak to his family. One day, witnessing Paul's psychological decline, I asked him if he fancied a trip outside. Despite initial reluctance, he eventually gave in to some gentle persuasion from the staff nurse, with whom he had developed a close bond. So there we went;Paul, his nurse and me. And as we wheeled his bed through the door into open air, Paul's whole demeanour suddenly changed. He appeared as though the weight of the world had been lifted from his shoulders and his face lit up with awe, a tear emerging in the corner of his eye. In that moment he rediscovered life. Not as a hospital patient, but as a person. Watching the world go by, he remembered what it was like to be a member of the human race, not the subject of endless tests and treatments. He tasted freedom. Conclusion(s): Awakened by his experience of the forgotten outside world, when we eventually returned to the ICU Paul was an entirely different man. To Paul, the trip outside symbolised progress. After weeks of frustration and despair, he finally had a purpose;a motivation to get better. Meanwhile, I was having my own quiet realisation. I now understood what it truly meant to deliver holistic care. It can become all too easy to focus on the clinical aspects;to obsess about the numbers. But in fact, often what matter most to patients are the 'little things', to which no amount of medication is the solution. I now try to consider during my daily review: what matters to this patient? How are they feeling? What are they thinking? What else can I do to help their psychological recovery? And as for me personally? Having witnessed Paul's reaction to the outside world, I suddenly became aware of how little attention I normally pay to the world around me. How little I appreciate the simple ability to walk outside, and the fundamental things we take for granted. Now, when I'm feeling annoyed or frustrated about something trivial, I stop and think of Paul. I then thank my lucky stars for what I have to be grateful for. Ultrasound Ninja.
ABSTRACT
Therapy with neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is particularly relevant during COVID-19 outbreaks in patients at high risk of severe disease, including kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Objective(s): to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neutralizing mAbs in KTRs with mild to moderate COVID-19. Materials and methods. The retrospective study included 99 KTRs who received inpatient treatment for COVID-19 between September 1 and December 31, 2021. Patients were 52.0 +/- 11.5 years old (M, 47.5%). Bamlanivimab/etesevimab combination drug at a dose of 700/1400 mg was used as mAbs. To evaluate the efficacy of mAbs therapy, two groups of patients were identified. Group 1 consisted of 33 KTRs who received mAbs as one of the therapy components, while group 2 consisted of 66 patients who received no mAbs. Discharge from the hospital or death was considered as the endpoint of follow-up. Results. In group 1, after the use of mAb, progression of pulmonary process was observed less frequently than in the control group with CT1-2 transformation to CT3-4 (9.1% vs. 30.3%, respectively, p < 0.01). Group 1 KTRs differed significantly from group 2 - lower need for ICU and ventilator care (6.1% vs. 27.3% and 3% vs. 19.8%, respectively). The groups were comparable by sex, age, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and time after kidney transplant (KTx) at the onset of the disease and by aseline blood biochemistry parameter values at the time of hospitalization. Only C-reactive protein (CRP) and fibrinogen values were higher in the non-mAbs patients who were hospitalized later in the course of the disease (7.7 +/- 3.2 days versus 4.6 +/- 1.6 days in group 1, p < 0.001). The frequency of prescription of other therapies did not differ between the compared groups. Use of mAbs significantly reduced mortality from 19.7% in KTRs in group 2 to 3% in group 1 without adverse effect on graft function. Conclusion. The use of mAbs therapy in the early stages of COVID-19 in KTRs is safe, it prevents severe COVID-19, and reduces the incidence of adverse outcomes.Copyright © 2023 Russian Transplant Society. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
We conducted a review and evaluated the already documents reports for the relationship among diabetes and COVID-19. The review outcome shows that the COVID-19 severity seems to be greater among patients with diabetes as comorbidity. So, strict glycemic control is imperative in patients infected with COVID-19. Thus, world-wide diabetes burden and COVID-19 pandemic must be deliberated as diabetes increases the COVID-19 severity. Established on this, it is precise significant to follow specific treatment protocols and clinical management in COVID-19 patients affected with diabetes to prevent morbidity and mortality.Copyright © 2023 The Authors.
ABSTRACT
Considering the commonality of the pathogenetic links of the critical forms of COVID-19 and influenza AH1N1pdm09 (cytokine over-release syndrome), the question arises: will the predictors of an unfavorable outcome in patients on mechanical ventilation and, accordingly, the universal tactics of respiratory support in these diseases be identical? Objective. In a comparative aspect, to characterize patients with influenza AH1N1pdm09 and COVID-19 who were on mechanical ventilation, to identify additional clinical and laboratory risk factors for death, to determine the degree of influence of respiratory support (RP) tactics on an unfavorable outcome in the studied category of patients. Patients and methods. Patients treated on the basis of resuscitation and intensive care departments of the State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "SKIB" in Krasnodar and the State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "IB No 2" in Sochi were studied: group 1 - 31 people with influenza AH1N1pdm09 (21 people died - subgroup 1A;10 people survived - subgroup 1B) and group 2 - 50 people with COVID-19 (29 patients died - subgroup 2A;21 people survived - subgroup 2B). All patients developed hypoxemic ARF. All patients received step-by-step tactics of respiratory support, starting with oxygen therapy and ending with the use of "traditional" mechanical ventilation. Continuous variables were compared in subgroups of deceased and surviving patients for both nosologies at the stages: hospital admission;registration of hypoxemia and the use of various methods of respiratory therapy;development of multiple organ dysfunctions. With regard to the criteria for which a statistically significant difference was found (p < 0.05), we calculated a simple correlation, the relative risk of an event (RR [CI 25-75%]), the cut-off point, which corresponded to the best combination of sensitivity and specificity. Results. Risk factors for death of patients with influenza AH1N1pdm09 on mechanical ventilation: admission to the hospital later than the 8th day of illness;the fact of transfer from another hospital;leukocytosis >=10.0 x 109/l, granulocytosis >=5.5 x 109/l and LDH level >=700.0 U/l at admission;transfer of patients to mechanical ventilation on the 9th day of illness and later;SOFA score >=8;the need for pressor amines and replacement of kidney function. Predictors of poor outcome in ventilated COVID-19 patients: platelet count <=210 x 109/L on admission;the duration of oxygen therapy for more than 4.5 days;the use of HPNO and NIV as the 2nd step of RP for more than 2 days;transfer of patients to mechanical ventilation on the 14th day of illness and later;oxygenation index <=80;the need for pressors;SOFA score >=8. Conclusion. When comparing the identified predictors of death for patients with influenza and COVID-19 who needed mechanical ventilation, there are both some commonality and differences due to the peculiarities of the course of the disease. A step-by-step approach to the application of respiratory support methods is effective both in the case of patients with influenza AH1N1pdm09 and patients with COVID-19, provided that the respiratory support method used is consistent with the current state of the patient and his respiratory system, timely identification of markers of ineffectiveness of the respiratory support stage being carried out and determining the optimal moment escalation of respiratory therapy.Copyright © 2022, Dynasty Publishing House. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Despite several studies, the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on patients with multiple myeloma remains uncertain. Material(s) and Method(s): We performed a survey that covered the period of the first and second waves of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic in 23 centers inseven countries. Out of 352 patients with myeloma and SARS-CoV-2, 23% died. Results/Conclusions: Logistic regression showed a lower risk of death among patients treated with proteasome inhibitor and a higher risk of death for those who had a severe or a very severe course of disease.Copyright © 2023 Sciendo. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: At our hospital, people with COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) had a high rate of pulmonary barotrauma. Therefore, the current study looked at barotrauma in COVID-19 patients getting invasive and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation to assess its prevalence, clinical results, and features. Methodology: Our retrospective cohort study comprised of adult COVID-19 pneumonia patients who visited our tertiary care hospital between April 2020 and September 2021 and developed barotrauma. Result(s): Sixty-eight patients were included in this study. Subcutaneous emphysema was the most frequent type of barotrauma, reported at 67.6%;pneumomediastinum, reported at 61.8%;pneumothorax, reported at 47.1%. The most frequent device associated with barotrauma was CPAP (51.5%). Among the 68 patients, 27.9% were discharged without supplemental oxygen, while 4.4% were discharged on oxygen. 76.5% of the patients expired because of COVID pneumonia and its complications. In addition, 38.2% of the patients required invasive mechanical breathing, and 77.9% of the patients were admitted to the ICU. Conclusion(s): Barotrauma in COVID-19 can pose a serious risk factor leading to mortality. Also, using CPAP was linked to a higher risk of barotrauma.Copyright © 2021 Muslim OT et al.
ABSTRACT
Background: Improving basic infection control (IC) practices, diagnostics and anti-microbial stewardship (AMS) are key tools to handle antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Material(s) and Method(s): This is a retrospective study done over 6 years (2016-2021) in an oncology centre in North India with many on-going interventions to improve IC practices, diagnostics and AMS. This study looked into AMR patterns from clinical isolates, rates of hospital acquired infections (HAI) and clinical outcomes. Result(s): Over all, 98,915 samples were sent for culture from 158,191 admitted patients. Most commonly isolated organism was E. coli (n = 6951;30.1%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 5801;25.1%) and Pseudomonas aeroginosa (n = 3041;13.1%). VRE (Vancomycin resistant Enterococcus) rates fell down from 43.5% in Jan-June 2016 to 12.2% in July-Dec 2021, same was seen in CR (carbapenem resistant) Pseudomonas (23.0%-20.6%, CR Acinetobacter (66.6%-17.02%) and CR E. coli (21.6%-19.4%) over the same study period. Rate of isolation of Candida spp. from non-sterile sites also showed reduction (1.68 per 100 patients to 0.65 per 100 patients). Incidence of health care associated infections also fell from 2.3 to 1.19 per 1000 line days for CLABSI, 2.28 to 1.88 per 1000 catheter days for CAUTI. There was no change in overall mortality rates across the study period. Conclusion(s): This study emphasizes the point that improving compliance to standard IC recommendations and improving diagnostics can help in reducing the burden of antimicrobial resistance.Copyright © 2023 Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists
ABSTRACT
Background: We reviewed patients with COVID-19 ARDS managed with VV-ECMO support at our center from March 2020 until February 2022. Material(s) and Method(s): We extracted data from electronic health records (Metavision and DIPS). We registered premorbid health status, ventilator-settings before initiation of ECMO, the time-course, and hospital mortality. Result(s): Thirty patients were managed at our hospital, with a median age of 57.2 years (28-65) and median BMI 28 (22-40). No patient had any serious comorbidity. Twenty-two patients received non-invasive ventilation prior to intubation (1-10 days). The median time on ventilator were 8.0 days (1-19) prior to ECMO and median tidal volume was 5.8 mL/kg PBW (3.1-7.5). Hypoxemia (median PaO2-FiO2 ratio 8 kPa, range 6-12 kPa) and hypercapnia (median PaCO2 11.9 kPa, range 4.2-18.5) [SEP1] despite lung protective ventilation were the main indications for VV-ECMO. Two patients had severe respiratory acidosis without hypoxemia. 18 patients developed serious complications while managed with ECMO (acute renal failure, clinically significant bleeding, sepsis, right ventricular heart failure, dislocation of cannulae). Seven patients received renal replacement therapy. Sixteen patients (53%) died. Thirteen patients (43%) died on ECMO, three (10%) after weaning, Twelve (40%) were discharged from hospital, two are currently in ICU (7%). The median duration of ECMO and ventilator treatment, was 27 (6-50) and 37 (9-78) days, respectively. Conclusion(s): Management of patients with COVID-19 ARDS with VV-ECMO is very resource-intensive, and accompanied by serious complications and high mortality. In-hospital mortality in our cohort was 53%, which is comparable with reports from other centers. However, the duration of ECMO, and pre-ECMO mechanical ventilation, were longer than typically reported.
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 has brought unprecedented changes in every aspect of life throughout the world including the healthcare delivery system. After a grinding halt in surgical practice due to this pandemic, the conventional protocols needed a thorough overhaul before kick-starting formal services. This study discusses ways and procedure changes adopted at the Urology department to navigate this crisis and extend adequate urological care to patients at the same time. Aim(s): To share our experience of patient management in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Method(s): It's a descriptive review article based on patient management protocols and clinical audit in the era of COVID-19 pandemic at the Departmentof Urology, MTI, Lady Reading Hospital from 20th Marchto 20th June 2020. Clinical implication the benefit of this study is how to organize things and continue health care provision in a deadly pandemic. Furthermore, it will set a precedence that how to cope with such a pandemic in the future. Conclusion(s): All surgical patients should be screened for COVID-19, with preference given to PCR tests. All elective surgeries should be put on hold as a result of the limited availability of ventilators, manpower, and hospital beds. Only semi-elective, lifesaving and oncologic surgeries that cannot be delayed should be done with full PPEs provided to every personnel frequenting operating theaters during the procedure. Furthermore, more efforts are needed to lift the infrastructure of hospitals and make them capable to face problems of such proportions in the future.Copyright © 2023 Lahore Medical And Dental College. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objective. The prognosis value of fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4) in COVID-19 is controversial. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the association between the FIB-4 index and COVID-19 disease progression. Methods. We performed meta-analysis using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. A fixed- or random-effects model was used for evaluating heterogeneity. Results. Thirteen studies were included. The meta-analysis of unadjusted results showed that compared to lower FIB-4 index, patients with higher FIB-4 index had increased odds of mortality (OR=5.1, 95%CI 3.67-7.09;P<0.001), ICU admission (OR=2.32, 95%CI: 1.65-3.25, P<0.00001) and need for mechanical ventilator support (OR=3.51, 95%CI: 2.1-5.85, P<0.001). In addition, the meta-analysis of adjusted results showed patients with higher FIB-4 index was associated with increased risk of mortality (OR=3.01, 95%CI: 2.21-4.09, P<0.001) and need for mechanical ventilator support (OR=3.76, 95%CI: 2.08-6.82, P<0.001) compared to patients with lower FIB-4 index. Conclusion. This meta-analysis indicated that high FIB-4 index score was associated with the severity and mortality in COVID-19 infected patients.Copyright © 2022 by the Association of Clinical Scientists, Inc.
ABSTRACT
Lymphangitis carcinomatosa refers to pulmonary interstitial involvement by cancer and is a dreaded clinical finding in oncology because it is a late manifestation indicative of metastatic malignancy, from either a lung or a nonlung primary cancer, and is associated with poor prognosis. Its presentation is nonspecific, often with subacute dyspnoea and a nonproductive cough in a person with a known history of malignancy, but in some cases is the first manifestation of cancer. CT imaging can be suggestive, typically demonstrating thickening of the peribronchovascular interstitium, interlobular septa and fissures. However, a biopsy may be required to confirm the pathological diagnosis as these changes can also be due to concurrent disease such as heart failure, ILD, infection, radiation pneumonitis and drug reactions. Diagnosis allows symptomatic treatment, with personalised treatment directed towards the primary cancer most likely to provide a meaningful benefit. Future research should focus on prospective clinical trials to identify new interventions to improve both diagnosis and treatment of lymphangitis carcinomatosa.Copyright © ERS 2021.